This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Dax just received a phone call—a devastating one. His mother, Emily, recently passed, and Dax was named executor of her estate. He diligently prepared the initial probate petition, filed it, and even managed to secure a hearing date. But now, the original will—the one he filed as an exhibit—has surfaced with a handwritten codicil altering the beneficiaries. The codicil wasn’t with the attorney when Emily signed the will, and Dax is certain it’s not valid, but he needs time to consult with a forensic document examiner to prove his suspicions. If he proceeds with the hearing as scheduled, the judge will likely approve the altered will, potentially diverting assets away from Emily’s intended heirs. The cost of inaction—a permanently flawed estate distribution—is astronomical.
What happens if I realize, right before my hearing, that I need more time to prepare?

It’s a common scenario. You’ve diligently prepared for your probate hearing, but then new information surfaces – a lost document, a conflicting claim, or, as with Dax, a potentially fraudulent codicil. The temptation is to try and “tough it out,” but pushing forward unprepared can be a costly mistake. California law offers a pathway to request a continuance, but you must follow specific procedures.
How do I formally ask the court for more time?
Simply informing the judge at the hearing isn’t enough. You MUST file a formal request, typically called an “Application for Continuance.” This is a written motion explaining why you need more time, the length of the continuance requested, and a showing of good cause. Be specific and detailed; vague reasons like “more discovery needed” are unlikely to be granted. The court wants to know exactly what you’re doing with the additional time and how it will impact the case. It’s not enough to just hope the judge will agree.
What if the other side objects to my request?
Objections are common, especially if the opposing party believes a continuance will cause undue delay or hardship. This is where having a well-reasoned and documented application becomes crucial. The judge will weigh your reasons against the potential prejudice to the other side. The judge retains discretion, but a compelling argument, supported by evidence, significantly increases your chances of success. If an objection is made, you may have the opportunity to argue your position orally at a hearing on the continuance request itself.
Can I get a continuance if I just missed a deadline?
Missing a deadline severely weakens your position, but it’s not always fatal. File the requested continuance immediately, explaining the reason for the delay and why you believe the court should excuse it. The judge will likely require a strong showing of excusable neglect – meaning something unforeseen and unavoidable prevented you from meeting the deadline. A simple oversight or lack of diligence isn’t likely to be sufficient.
What if I need to subpoena a key witness who can’t make the original hearing date?
This is a legitimate reason for a continuance. You MUST demonstrate that you’ve made a good-faith effort to secure the witness’s attendance and that their testimony is crucial to your case. Include a copy of the subpoena request with your application, showing the date the witness is unavailable. Be prepared to explain why you didn’t subpoena the witness earlier.
I just learned about a potential problem with the will. Is a continuance still possible?
Absolutely. This is precisely the situation Dax is facing. A questionable codicil or potential fraud demands thorough investigation. Include a declaration explaining the issue and outlining the steps you intend to take—such as hiring a forensic document examiner—to resolve it. The judge will likely grant a continuance to allow you to gather evidence and protect the integrity of the probate process.
What if the judge denies my request for a continuance?
While disappointing, it’s not necessarily the end. You can request the judge reconsider, but you’ll need to present new information or arguments. Failing that, you may have to proceed with the hearing as scheduled, even if unprepared. However, if you believe the denial was an abuse of discretion, you may have grounds for an appeal.
For over 35 years, I’ve helped families navigate the complexities of probate, and one thing I’ve learned is that preparation is paramount. As an attorney and CPA, I bring a unique perspective to estate planning and probate. The CPA side allows me to deeply understand the tax implications—specifically the crucial “step-up in basis” that can save your heirs significant capital gains taxes. It also gives me the expertise to accurately value complex assets, ensuring a fair distribution of the estate. A seemingly small error in valuation can lead to years of IRS scrutiny.
What happens if I simply don’t show up to the hearing?
Don’t do it. Probate Code § 1220 states that if you miss a hearing because you weren’t properly notified, the order might be void. However, simply failing to appear without requesting a continuance or explaining your absence is a near-certain path to an unfavorable outcome. The court will likely proceed in your absence, and any orders issued will be binding.
What about Remote Appearances – can I participate in the hearing via Zoom?
Yes, in many cases. Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75 now permanently allows for remote appearances in probate hearings, provided you give proper notice. While the “emergency” rules have evolved, California law now permanently allows for remote appearances in probate hearings, provided you give notice. However, the judge retains discretion to require specific personal appearances for evidentiary hearings or trials.
How do enforcement rules in California probate court shape outcomes for heirs and fiduciaries?
California probate is designed to provide court-supervised transfer of property, yet cases often break down when authority is unclear, required steps are missed, or disputes arise over assets, notice, and fiduciary conduct. When the process is misunderstood, families can face avoidable delay, escalating conflict, and increased exposure to creditor issues, hearings, or litigation before the estate can close.
To protect against specific family risks, review intestate succession conflicts, check for left-out heirs issues, and be vigilant for signs of financial abuse concerns.
A stable probate administration outcome usually follows from clarity, consistency, and readiness for court review, especially when multiple stakeholders and competing interpretations are involved. When documentation supports enforcement and timelines are respected, families are less likely to face preventable escalation.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq.43920 Margarita Rd Ste F Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 223-7000
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq. is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |